Figure 6From: Accounting for density reduction and structural loss in standing dead trees: Implications for forest biomass and carbon stock estimates in the United StatesRegional differences (with 95% confidence intervals) in C stocks (Tg) by estimation method (CRM vs. CRM+DRF and CRM vs. CRM+DRF+SLA) and decay class for quaking aspen (left) in the Lake States (2005-2009) and Douglas-fir (right) in the Pacific Northwest (2001-2009).Back to article page